All Manga, Character Designs and Logos are © to their respective copyright holders.
REVIEWS
JewelsRocks on Kouguu no Omega
I mostly happy that there is no ra** in this story because almost every omegaverse story has ra** in it and it's so exhausting and disgusting to read. But his story is nice
Reply
(4)
Sucks big time on You Who Wants to Love
dropped it the second i opened it and realized it was black and white. the cover page is a scam😭
Reply
(1)(34)
FYI, japanese manga are usually in black and white. Korean manhwa or Chinese manhua is usually in colours. So pls dont say is scam
Top manga:
https://mangabuddy.com/manga-list/83970
https://mangabuddy.com/manga-list/68035 (yaoi)
Chasing list:
https://mangabuddy.com/manga-list/68036
Beautiful BL:
https://mangabuddy.com/manga-list/137865
dude. If you pick up a book with beautiful colours and then open the book to find just BLACK AND WHITE words. Then put down the book saying 'this book is a scam' then ur really missing out on something good. This was a great manga and probably half the manga in this world is black and white.
I don't care what others say BL is amazing 
Don't mess with the puppy, Werewolf Hunter, Double Beastly Trouble, and Sketch are my fav BL's 
Pfp is can angels do this. 3somes recs? I got u
Rocks on The Lord of Money
Not entarely original idea for story but it's wellness executed leaving no open questions about second person. MC is likeable and smart and since its not action, romance (there is small love story but it's done well and doesnt have much to do with main story) there is no idiotic missunerstandings or unrealistic violence setting (fights are little ridicoulus but the are rare and fun). It's qiute difficult to understand sometimes since there are a lot of financial terms, trading strategies etc. but focus is more on success story of main character rather than on mental gymnastics of financial wold and it's innerworkings. Overall very good writing, art is nice, translation top notch and blend of different genres keep it fresh. I reccomend
Reply
(2)